Applying Four Practical Tests for Ecosystem Accountability
When we try to manage relationships across organizational boundaries using traditional, hierarchy-bound tools, the line runs out right where we need it most.
In a recent piece,Accountability at the Edge: Design Principles for Ecosystems Beyond Hierarchy, I explored why traditional, single-name accountability breaks down at the boundary. Moving across organizational lines requires a fundamental design shift—moving away from static compliance and adopting dynamic verbs like push, convene, and adapt.
Explaining this is vital, but how do you know if your team or ecosystem is actually doing the work?
Events are running ahead of you. You have that feeling you are falling behind, competitively. You are not seeing your market the same, it is changing in front of your eyes. You are being faced by external events that seem to leave you “flat footed”.
Catching this early enough isn’t mainly a technology question, and it isn’t solved by one team working harder to watch more dashboards. It’s a question of organisational design — specifically, whether the way you’re structured to sense a shift is still built for a world where most of the useful signal sits inside your own four walls.
We are living in an event-driven world now, whether or not any given organisation has caught up to that fact. Things don’t move on your planning cycle anymore. A partner reprices without warning. A regulation shifts before your working group has finished its first draft. A competitor reconfigures its offer, and by the time your team has fully understood what happened, two more moves have already followed it. Reaction timehas become critical. The world moves in events; most organisations are still built to move on schedules.
That mismatch is what recognition actually depends on here — not “are things changing,” which everyone already knows, but “are we still finding out about change on a timetable, when the change itself doesn’t wait for one.”
I built the Nine Dimensions comparative diagnostic to evaluate the differences between organisations on their Ecosystem journey to gain both insights and potential gaps that might want to be filled, hopefully with my help.
Recently I undertook a set of focused evaluations on different Healthcare organizations- Novartis, Roche, Bayer, Royal Philips and Siemens Healthineers for understanding their present Ecosystem position.
My next step was to extend this diagnostic approach across into other sectors as well, in wanting to establish a more updated “universal” diagnostic tool. This post takes me into the Industrial sector and the e-commerce one
So,stepping out of the work achieved in the Heathcare sector I have actually re-tested* against a group of Industrial and e-commerce offering marketplaces connecting businesses and buyers worldwide. I chose Siemens AG, Schneider Electric, Salesforce and Alibaba.
*Why re-tested? In much earlier work on Ecosystem validations I used a different nine dimensions, more general-purpose instrument: it was good for establishing “does this company have ecosystem architecture at all,” weak for discriminating between companies that are all somewhere in the ecosystem-emerging middle or their own ecosystem understanding. It helped me learn and relate as I was building my IIBE blueprint
This revised Nine Dimension is a sharper, more comparative instrument because it was built (or refined) under the pressure of actually needing to differentiate real companies against each other, not designed in the abstract.
This was a test to run pulling current evidence on each company’s actual ecosystem/partner model. In this specific diagnostic I had expected a cleaner split between Siemens and Schneider and Salesforce and Alibaba as these two are regarded as more mature in their Ecosystem approaches
Appreciating Assets as a new Ecosystem accounting class
Current accounting fails ecosystems. Traditional accounting assumes assets wear out, value declines with use and treats relationships as expense, knowledge is seen as overheads, coordination is a cost and trust is intangible and is left untracked.
Ecosystem assets are the capital class that becomes more valuable every time it is used. Investing in them is not a cost – it is the foundation of compounding advantage. In some ways applying this logic offers a real breakthrough, it reframes the entire investment conversation in ecosystems – and you can turn compounding from a metaphor into a management system.
It is time for us to consider treating Ecosystem assets as an appreciating capital asset class – because they grow stronger through use – and our accounting must shift from measuring cost/return to measuring what is being built and how fast it appreciates.
*** Depreciation logic was built for assets to die.
Intelligent Business Ecosystems Report 2026 connects the needed integration
In an era defined by volatility, complexity, confrontations and rapid technological acceleration, the traditional model of the isolated firm is becoming obsolete. Rigid linear value chains are failing to keep pace with the demand for speed, adaptability, innovation and sustainability.
To survive and thrive, organizations must transcend traditional buisiness silos and evolve into adaptive, resilient interconnected ecosystems
We are sensing the world is entering a decisive shift: in this case from platform-centric models towards fully dynamic, intelligent, coninuously orchestrated business ecosystems.
Client Solutions for the Integrated Business Ecosysten (IIBE)
I am being asked how I structure my IIBE offering in a commercial structure to offer a clear pathway for potential clients. These are evolving as more modules are coming on stream or currently “in the works” as being validated.
The Key in my approach is to offer A modular, flexible commercial structure enabling tailored pathways for clients at different ecosystem maturity levels.
The designing principle of the Core Commercial Logic
The IIBE commercial model is built as a progressive pathway, allowing clients to enter at different points depending on maturity, ambition, and urgency. All offerings align to four principles: (1) Low-friction entry points (2) Capability-building progression (3) Implementation support (4) Ongoing advisory and intelligence renewal
Every module is independent but connects into a broader arc of ecosystem capability formation.
Applicable from January 2026, subject to updates and change as portfolio of offers expands.
A client entry point recommended within the IIBE Offerings
Within my commercial model for client offerings, provided for Ecosystem building, thinking and design, the value of exploring Tier One as an initial low-cost investment is a great place to start. This extends the understanding of what lies under the IIBE hood, that fires and delivers your Ecosystem ambitions.
It provides some critical insights into how you could position your business for obtaining a competitive advantage at very low investments. You gain a highly valuable return for discovery, understanding and positioning of your Ecosystem.
Firstly Explaining The Overarching Commercial Logic
The IIBE commercial model is built as a progressive pathway, allowing clients to enter at different points depending on maturity, ambition, and urgency. All offerings align to four principles: (1) Low-friction entry points (2) Capability-building progression (3) Implementation support (4) Ongoing advisory and intelligence renewal
Every module is independent but connects into a broader arc of ecosystem capability formation.
Applying the IIBE Lens to the Grid Complexity to Trigger Collaboration
I believe there is a strong positioning proposal for forming an Intelligent Integrated Energy Ecosystem to confront the growing Grid Crisis.
Let’s Frame the Challenge– Across Europe, as well as the United States of America and multiple countries or regions globally, electricity grids are reaching structural limits
Increasing renewable penetration, growing electrification, distributed energy resources (DER), and the rise of prosumers have created a coordination problem of enormous complexity.
I wanted to provide a simple Executive Explainer on the The Integrated Interconnected Business Ecosystem (IIBE)
Background to the IIBE Model– Executive Summary
The global business environment is entering a decisive shift: from platform-centric models to dynamic, intelligent, interconnected ecosystems. The convergence of AI-driven intelligence, orchestrated collaboration, micro-ecosystem structures, and regenerative purpose is reshaping how value is created, governed, and scaled.
The Integrated Interconnected Business Ecosystem (IIBE) provides the operating logic for this transition. This expainer outlines the key dynamics, design principles, and strategic pathways that will define the Intelligent Business Ecosystem era from 2026 to 2030.
In my opinion and for many others, Ecosystems are the necessary pathway all Business will need to consider and then travel for dealing in a complex, challenging world where closer more deliberate collaboration and co-creation will be needed, to solve more complicated problems that individual organizations will find it increasingly difficult to be able to solve these on their own .
In Seven Explaining parts this provides answers to key questions on the IIBE as an initial background briefing:
