Platform Strategy and Ecosystem Architecture Do Different Work
Tension: Ecosystem work is often judged against platform strategy, as if the two were competing answers to the same question. They are not.
Cause: They answer different questions. One is built around a single firm that connects others to it. The other is built for independent firms that must create value together, with no one in charge of all of it as it has to be highly orchestrated.
Outcome: Choosing the right one starts with asking which problem you actually have and your ambition and appetite for a more open set of collaborations and exchanges.
Platform strategy is a strong body of thinking, built out and studied over many years, about how one firm builds a place where others meet, trade and build. It is concerned with matching two sides of a market, reducing friction and growing through network effects. It assumes an orchestrator who owns the connecting layer and sets the rules.
Ecosystem architecture asks a different question: how do independent firms, none of which owns the whole, align their contributions to deliver something none could deliver alone? There may be no platform at all. There are several balance sheets, several sets of incentives, and a need for rules that the partners can live with and this requires significant ongoing coordination and adaptability in orchestrating and governance
Continue reading
