Evaluating Bayer and Roche for their future Ecosystem potential

Starting here in any Diagnostic for Building Ecosystems

Within my work on Ecosystems a significant amount of this is through Diagnostics that leads to Discovery.

Over the past month or so I have been focusing on the Healthcare section and through a number of my diagnostic tools assessed GE Healthcare, Siemens Healthineers, Royal Philips, Novartis, Bayer and Roche.

Why Healthcare? If ever the potential for applying Ecosystem thinking and design it would be in Healthcare. Yet there is so much fragmentation, current relationship constraints and design obstacles to. resolve.

I have posted observations on Siemens Healthineers (post here) and Royal Philips recently. Specifically for Royal Philips I did a very extensive Business Case outline over four posts as I took a broader range of my diagnostic tools to apply to them

Here I am focusing on Bayer and Roche, specially through my Nine-dimensional diagnostic. They aim to offer structural truths. They exist whether the organization acknowledges them. The diagnostic does not create them, it makes them visible. The ones outlined here are not part of the total evaluation undertaken, they are an initial snapshot that needs some more detailed input to gain a more definitive result.

The importance within the IIBE is the sequence, handoff, linkage and movements. In this case the nine components shown are here in these results more “stand alone”, indicative of opportunities for organizations to focus and evaluate each component, to recognise the needs to improve or spot the constraints.

The results for Bayer and Roche offered surprising and different results in the stages they are at in Ecosystem design progress

Continue reading

Royal Philips: Will It Shape the MedTech System — or Be Shaped by It?

Royal Philips- Shaping or Being Shaped for its MedTech future?

We need to ask a broader question here: what does it actually take for an organisation to shape the system it operates in, rather than simply adapt to it?

Philips is not just the subject of the analysis. It is the case that makes the wider architectural question visible.

The Philips case matters because it shows the difference between speaking in ecosystem terms and building for ecosystem behavior. The lesson goes beyond one company: many organizations want ecosystem leadership, but few redesign their operating logic to support it.

The diagnosis is clear: Philips is speaking at system level while still operating largely at company level. That matters not only for Philips, but for any organization that aspires to ecosystem leadership without yet redesigning its architecture to match.

This second part of a series that builds on the Philips analysis following on from the first article: Royal Philips: Metaphor or operating logic?

This article raises some of those tougher questions when you are building collaborative Ecosystems.

Continue reading

 The Urgent Need for Flexibility & Resilience through Energy Ecosystem Alliances.

Applying the IIBE Lens to the Grid Complexity to Trigger Collaboration

I believe there is a strong positioning proposal for forming an Intelligent Integrated Energy Ecosystem to confront the growing Grid Crisis.

Let’s Frame the Challenge– Across Europe, as well as the United States of America and multiple countries or regions globally, electricity grids are reaching structural limits

Increasing renewable penetration, growing electrification, distributed energy resources (DER), and the rise of prosumers have created a coordination problem of enormous complexity.

Continue reading

The Imperative of Ecosystems in a Modern World- we need to value collaborative networks

Interconnected Business Ecosystems- the imperative in a modern world

Background and Introduction

I enjoy the value of building different thoughts through Mind Mapping. They trigger as well as pull together different strands. In a world that seems to be facing a new world order in trade, collaboration and cooperation, we need building mechanisms that can adapt and give a better resilience in “selective” networks. For me, building and designing Business Ecosystems offers a different way of enabling growth, different value and worth.

So let me tell you the story of Business Ecosystems in a modern world

In today’s rapidly evolving world, the concept of ecosystems has emerged as a critical model for achieving sustainable growth and addressing complex challenges. Ecosystems, in this context, refer to networks of interconnected entities—whether they be businesses, communities, or technologies—working collaboratively to create value and drive innovation.

The imperative of ecosystems is becoming increasingly evident as we navigate a more interconnected world, where working together isn’t just beneficial, but essential.

Continue reading

Ecosystem Design and Thinking: A Strategic Response to Recognizing Change

Building a new Interconnected Business Ecosystem Design

I have recently been reworking my views on Business Ecosystems in their thinking and design. They are recognizing a fundamental shift in how we approach problem-solving and value creation. We need to continue to urge businesses to move away from often isolated, linear models towards this thinking and design, forming around being interconnected, based on dynamic systems.

It is moving towards a collaborative, interconnected design that makes for a radically different mindset where complex relationships, where value co-creation and balancing both short-term and long-term become central for sustainability and protecting a viable future.

We do need to recognize Business is on a Burning Platform: Why Traditional Approaches Are Failing

Continue reading

What I see in the Integrated Business Ecosystem

By integrating your Business Ecosystem

I do, it seems, work a lot on integrating systems. So much of this work is specifically focused on advancing innovation in processes, design, and flows through applying Ecosystem thinking and design. So much of what we discover seems to always fall between gaps in how we organize this into a cohesive whole getting to a commercial conclusion.

There are many reasons, for example, it could be in the handover from one person to another or team to team, it could be the ignoring of aspects that seemed unimportant earlier on, ignored as a concept progresses and completely forgotten at the final stages, yet this insight or nugget of information held the key to unlocking a discovery moment. We seem bad at integrating our thinking or processes, hence my constant “quest” to find ways to bring things together for integrated thinking and designs.

This is why I focus on Ecosystems in thinking and design. The other day I picked up on something in my research I felt was important within Business Ecosystems thinking. It took a while to put this into the understanding that “really” seems to talk to me and I hope you

Let me explain as I think it is important:

Continue reading

A New Way to Drive Value Through The Integrated Business Ecosystem Design

Ecosystems in the business environment are taking on a growing importance to manage greater complexity and challenges in unique collaborations than the one single organization cannot handle themselves, so limiting their growth and value potential

We need a different framing of Ecosystems, in appreciating the whole as well as its parts. Often, we describe Ecosystems in far too simplistic terms and fail to recognize the interconnected value we need to bring together from multiple Ecosystems and Networks to extract the value potential that is possible in today’s connected world.

In constructing these Ecosystems I have here provided a short explainer of the Integrated Business Ecosystem Frame and then a summary page of each of its parts with specific definitions and key component parts outlined. These are Ecosystems specifically dealing with innovation, start-up and entrepreneurial, business, dynamism, business, enterprise and enterprise to enterprise (E2E)

Continue reading

Why Business Ecosystems are highly valuable to think through.

Thinking through Business Ecosystems

Business ecosystems have grown in real importance for me to focus upon. Alone on this site I have written around 200 plus posts that relate to ecosystems and platforms since 2016 when I started separating my innovation thinking with this business ecosystem one.

Today, I have turned full circle, there is a need for merging these back but into innovation ecosystems for one and business ecosystems for the other, to explain different essential value parts..

Having an ecosystem-centric approach has growing advantages to navigate complexity and strive towards a new level of sustaining growth and impact.

Designing Ecosystems for collaboration, co-creation and extending your business out in radically different ways needs thinking through. It has become essential for the sustainable future tacking more complex and challenging issues

Let me provide some thoughts on this:

Continue reading

Thinking and Designing for Business Ecosystems

Thinking & designing Business Ecosystems to build innovation differently

Why should we think about the potential within Business Ecosystems? What does thinking and designing for Business Ecosystems mean?

Thinking and designing for business ecosystems represents a fundamental shift in how we approach business strategy, innovation, and value creation. Let me break this down for you in a way that bridges conceptual understanding with practical application. Two statements:

  1. Thinking and designing for business ecosystems means adopting a holistic, interconnected view of business operations and strategy.
  2. Thinking and designing for Business Ecosystems is about recognizing that in today’s complex business environment, no company is an island. Success increasingly depends on a company’s ability to collaborate, co-create, and thrive within a network of diverse stakeholders.
Continue reading

Unlocking growth through Strategic Partner Ecosystems

The need to elevate Business Partner Ecosystems

In today’s complex business landscape, leveraging partner ecosystems offers a competitive edge.

Building an effective partner ecosystem in systematic stages in thinking and design becomes increasingly critical, to build the mindset, skills and understanding of what this means in undertaking to yield the level of return in different routes to growth and value.

Many organizations struggle with this transitioning from individual initiatives of partnering, mostly in partner agreements covering the supply chain, logistics and often in selected sales partners and distributors. These offer a foundation of sorts no doubt and are essential for maintaining the existing business but there is a whole different world of partner ecosystems out there to tap into!

Continue reading