Tag Archives: Collaborating across Industries

Beyond the Edge: 4 Practical Tests for Ecosystem Accountability

Posted on by
Accountability Beyond the Edge

Applying Four Practical Tests for Ecosystem Accountability

When we try to manage relationships across organizational boundaries using traditional, hierarchy-bound tools, the line runs out right where we need it most.

In a recent piece, Accountability at the Edge: Design Principles for Ecosystems Beyond Hierarchy, I explored why traditional, single-name accountability breaks down at the boundary. Moving across organizational lines requires a fundamental design shift—moving away from static compliance and adopting dynamic verbs like push, convene, and adapt.

Explaining this is vital, but how do you know if your team or ecosystem is actually doing the work?

Continue reading →

The crisis being faced in Precision Manufacturing in Germany- providing a different proposition

Posted on by

I received this “I have a friend who runs a small – medium sized business highly specialised in high precision machinery for one critical part of a car, including EV’s here in Germany. The forecast for the car future in Germany worries him as he in a niche provider, content today with what he does but sees a difficult future. He needs options and wonders how he can “break out” of his single business rather locked into the Car Industry. What would the Intelligent Integrated Business Ecosystem (IIBE) do for him? 

I refer back to Bob Gravestijns really probing article “Germany’s industrial memory loss: Why an engineering engine is losing the ecosystem play” to help explain how a country can still have world-class firms, skills and institutions, yet begin to lose the architecture that allows them to learn, align and adapt together.

So let me speak to your friend’s situation tuned to the reality of German precision manufacturing, the automotive transition, and the ecosystem pressures he’s feeling. 

This will show exactly what the IIBE would do for him, and why it matters now, not later. 

Continue reading →

Building the Sensing You Don’t Yet Have Requires A Networked approach

Posted on by

Events are running ahead of you. You have that feeling you are falling behind, competitively. You are not seeing your market the same, it is changing in front of your eyes. You are being faced by external events that seem to leave you “flat footed”.

Catching this early enough isn’t mainly a technology question, and it isn’t solved by one team working harder to watch more dashboards. It’s a question of organisational design — specifically, whether the way you’re structured to sense a shift is still built for a world where most of the useful signal sits inside your own four walls.

Continue reading →

The Decisions Are Already Being Made, Why Are We So Constantly Late?

Posted on by

We are living in an event-driven world now, whether or not any given organisation has caught up to that fact. Things don’t move on your planning cycle anymore. A partner reprices without warning. A regulation shifts before your working group has finished its first draft. A competitor reconfigures its offer, and by the time your team has fully understood what happened, two more moves have already followed it. Reaction timehas become critical. The world moves in events; most organisations are still built to move on schedules.

That mismatch is what recognition actually depends on here — not “are things changing,” which everyone already knows, but “are we still finding out about change on a timetable, when the change itself doesn’t wait for one.”

Continue reading →

Cross-sector collaboration for Innovation Ecosystems- summary of summaries

Posted on by

I wrote a four part series on cross-sector innovation ecosystems in April and I felt it was worth summarizing these into one, so I engaged my new office partner, ChatGPT to deliver this in a series of summaries. I can’t argue with these and decided to post these as a valuable initial referencing point on a growing area of organization need, in cross.-sector collaborations innovation ecosystem thinking.

The four-part series on cross-sector innovation ecosystem collaborations emphasizes the importance of collaboration in tackling complex challenges. The series discusses the skills, tools, and processes required for successful cross-sector collaborations, including interdisciplinary thinking, co-creation processes, project management, cultural competence, intellectual property management, and data analytics and visualization tools.

Continue reading →

The increasing pace of the IIoT world- don’t hold your breath.

Posted on by

You certainly have to make choices in life in where you focus your energy, otherwise, it gets way to complicated. For me to learn about Ecosystems and Platforms I have chosen a “select” group of IIoT players or advisors in their field to concentrate upon. Increasingly the insights and leading knowledge seems to be less coming out of the Big Consulting firms but more from those actually operating in the Industrial world (IIoT players).

These IIoT companies are living and breathing industrial solutions to achieve the digital transformation we see coming towards us. These are companies operating at the edge, in the middle in manufacturing the physical solutions or providing or combining the software solutions and they have their heads and assets firmly in the clouds every day. and on the ground. They are actually building the new IIoT world.

These are the likes of Siemens, Bosch, GE, Schneider Electrics, ABB and a few others. Then I often take a look at those operating from their China base, to build my continued understanding of the greater (to date) B2C market and where one, specifically. takes out their ever-growing ambitions, namely Alibaba.

Then, of course, you often “drink in” the consultant’s reviews or reports on our progress on digital transformation or industry 4.0 but they are increasingly lagging the players with a real deep “skin in the game”, that  of providing their client’s real tangible solutions. The pace of building an IIoT network is accelerating. I try to keep up and “project ahead” in the limited ways I can. Everything continues to change and accelerate in providing digital IIoT solutions. Continue reading →

Biting off more than we can chew can be a good thing……depending.

Posted on by

I had mentioned in a related post on my other posting site that I wanted to understand a recent Siemens event.

This was partly presenting 3rd financial quarter results but more on their future course with a Vision 2020+ and its respected parts being the design that is going to take the business out further by exploiting the parts within this vision.

There was a lot to take in on limited information and understanding. View the post “A feast of opportunities for Siemens?” for my first reactions on this.

The whole expansive story around Siemens new structure announced at this event offered some of the opening details, yet it is still to be “fleshed out” later in the year, by their management.

I specifically zoomed in on the new Digital Industries (DI) structure and where it is seemingly heading. Presently this new operating group will have 78,000 employees and a business revenue of around Euro 14 billion, that contributed a profit margin of around 16% in their fiscal 2017.

The expansion of the digitalization business has a very exciting acquisition announced the day before, with the Mendix acquisition, a leader, and pioneer in the area of low-code application development platforms, where you can potentially program and deploy apps up to ten times faster. This has been one of several “pain points” for Mindsphere, the Siemens digital platform, on providing a menu of apps to support client problems, so we should see some significant improvement on this point.

This purchase of Mendix can make a significant difference and propel the platform into a new value proposition, a 2nd generation digital platform where “smart” becomes central. I will be coming back to this once I have undertaken a little more research and assumption undertaking, in the next few days, as it has some compelling value positioning for Siemens, I believe.

It was the other part of the digitalization expansion that stopped me a little. This is what I want to discuss here. Let me work it through.
 Continue reading →

Opening up our thinking towards ecosystems has a powerful effect

Posted on by

ecosystems-abstract

Our whole understanding of innovation is changing, it is opening up to ecosystems and the necessary thinking and designing; there are numerous shifts occurring.

We are evaluating and changing our existing focus from closed (internal orientation) into ones that are having a far more open stance. We are searching for more collaborative innovation (external orientation) combining external partners into more ‘collective thinking’.

This shift is offering us extra acceleration that is needed to improve our innovation performances from concept to market delivery.

Collaborative innovation is also leading us to higher chances of achieving greater impact and success, as nearly all novel ideas lay outside the organization’s domain of understanding.

As we increasingly include the customer and their needs within our understanding, these multiple collaborations and dialogues are building this better internal understanding.

Continue reading →

Platform Providers need to think more about Ecosystems Principles and Design

Posted on by

In my opening post (here) I was thinking where platform providers seem to be, in their current value proposition. I cannot see their approaches as sustaining. Now, this is a personal opinion and observation but let me lay out an alternative view.

I believe we are at an inflection point where the design of IIoT platforms needs to be integrated into a new way of Ecosystem Design.

There is a real need for a more shared value, breaking through the old traditional boundaries of single companies working with ‘selected’ providers of service and highly selective platform providers.

Ecosystem design is about being open in all potentially valuable proposals and co-creation possibilities. It is using multiple platforms as being part of a very different future design. You go where the best collaborations can take place not get .locked into one.

We need to stop and start to think about Ecosystems and their design for platform providers. Platforms have been amazing in their design, recognition, and value in a very short time.

Platforms are changing the way we undertake business. We have passed through the early phase of their design. It is now time to bring platforms into their place within a greater Ecosystem design.

Continue reading →

The case for changing the IIoT platform providers value proposition

Posted on by

I have been reflecting recently on where we are in all the efforts, focus, and resources, that have been going into the building of our IIoT platforms. This has mainly been around the questioning of where they should fit within the needs of an ecosystem, the end outcome of our new industrial design, in my opinion, that enables digital transformation.

Let me offer up an initial case of why there is a need for a change in where we are on IIoT platforms and their current emphasis and focus on how we need to change the value equation out in the future in our solution designs and positioning of platforms, as a need to achieve. This is based on considering a greater ecosystem perspective, one that provides a sizable move towards a digital transformation we need to make.

Here I attempt to lay out the current position and suggest there is a case for change. The IIoT platform provider needs to change their value proposition urgently, in my opinion, or move along a faster evolutionary curve certainly, to get clients seeing their own value-add endgame, not just the IIoT providers race for dominating the platform space.

So let’s look at where IIoT platforms currently are, and in my related post where we might consider some changes in how we are evolving the platform story. Continue reading →